Operative Dictations in Urologic Surgery
Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA, Golan R. Epididymal cyst excision (spermatocelectomy), chapter 37, and Epididymectomy, chapter 38. Wiley, 2019
Followed for the indications, the essential steps and the template dictations. Chapter 37: an incision in the anterior hemiscrotal wall; the dartos and tunica vaginalis divided and the testis and epididymis delivered; the cyst identified and dissected from the epididymis. Its attachment is ligated and divided and the cyst sent to pathology, the base lightly cauterised, and testis, epididymis and cord inspected and returned untwisted. The dartos is closed running and the skin interrupted, with a drain at the discretion of the surgeon. Chapter 38: the vas ligated and divided proximal to the epididymis and the tail lifted off the testis. The artery of the epididymis is ligated near the junction of the upper and middle third, sparing the testicular artery, and the rest dissected off the tunica albuginea. The base is cauterised and a drain placed through a separate stab incision. Both chapters list chronic epididymal pain as an indication that may not be relieved. General practice, not from the chapters: the transverse incision, delivery before the tunica is opened, closing the covering of the head over the base, the handling of a ruptured or very large cyst, and every first, escalate and document step.
Open guideline
BAUS
British Association of Urological Surgeons. Removal of an epididymal cyst: information about your procedure. Leaflet A24/124, published September 2024, read 19 October 2026
No treatment needed if small or without significant symptoms; aspiration re-accumulates quickly and is not recommended. Removing the cyst interrupts the passage of sperm from the testis, may be irreversible and can interfere with fertility. The testis may feel slightly bulkier afterwards. Swelling and bruising in almost all; recurrence, haematoma that resolves slowly or needs drainage, and infection each between 1 in 10 and 1 in 50; chronic pain, scarring of the epididymis with impaired fertility, and damage to the testicular blood supply with atrophy each between 1 in 50 and 1 in 250.
Open guideline
International Journal of Andrology
Calleary JG, Masood J, Hill JT. Chronic epididymitis: is epididymectomy a valid surgical treatment? Int J Androl 2009;32:468-472
Abstract read 19 October 2026. 35 consecutive epididymectomies in 32 men, a UK series. With a palpable painful epididymal abnormality 87.5% were cured and the rest improved; with ultrasound abnormalities alone 67% had a satisfactory outcome; with a normal examination and ultrasound 20% were cured and a further 33% improved, at best a 55% chance of improvement.
Open guideline
Urology Practice
Cole RM, Andino JJ, Daignault-Newton S, Quallich SA, Hadj-Moussa M. Epididymectomy is an effective treatment for chronic epididymal pain. Urol Pract 2024;11:409-415
Abstract read 19 October 2026. 225 men over 20 years with pain localised to the epididymis; 72% cured or improved at last follow-up. Pain for more than 1 year, a diagnosed psychiatric condition, or previous scrotal, inguinal or abdominal surgery other than vasectomy reduced the odds of relief.
Open guideline