Operative Dictations in Urologic Surgery
Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA, Golan R. Rectocele repair. Chapter 95. Wiley, 2019
The indication, the six essential steps and their order, the template dictation followed here, the variations (a finger in the rectum during the dissection, levator plication and its risk of dyspareunia, graft or mesh reinforcement, a concurrent midurethral sling, a vaginal pack) and the complication list: bleeding, infection, rectal injury, dyspareunia, constipation, defecatory pain, recurrent rectocele. The chapter makes the perineorrhaphy conditional; it is shown here for an attenuated perineal body. Its numbered steps put the calibre check before closure and ask for at least two fingers in a sexually active woman; its dictation records the check after closure, with three fingers. The page follows the numbered steps. The chapter lists complications without their management: the first, escalate and document steps, the troubleshooting line on finding the plane, and the danger lines on the anal canal, on narrowing as the sutures are tied and on the palpable suture are general surgical practice. The scene is schematic and at the scale of its field: instruments and fingers are drawn small, the rectum is drawn pressed downward by closed forceps although the chapter does not say what applies the traction, and the closure is shown without any narrowing of the canal.
Open guideline
NICE
Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management (NG123), published April 2019, updated June 2019: recommendations 1.7.1, 1.7.5, 1.7.6, 1.8.1, 1.8.2, 1.8.23 and 1.8.24, read 13 October 2026
Discuss no treatment, non-surgical and surgical options; consider supervised pelvic floor muscle training and a vaginal pessary; offer surgery to women whose symptoms have not improved with or who have declined non-surgical treatment; the discussion to cover changes in urinary, bowel and sexual function and the risk of recurrent prolapse; offer posterior vaginal repair without mesh to women with a posterior vaginal wall prolapse; offer a review 6 months after surgery.
Open guideline
NICE
Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse (HealthTech guidance HTG456, formerly IPG599), December 2017: recommendation 1.1, read 13 October 2026
Current evidence on safety shows serious but well-recognised safety concerns, and evidence of long-term efficacy is inadequate in quality and quantity; the procedure should only be used in the context of research.
Open guideline
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Mowat A, Maher D, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Maher C. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD012975
Abstract read 13 October 2026. Ten randomised trials, 1,099 women; evidence quality very low to moderate. Recurrent posterior wall prolapse probably more likely after transanal than transvaginal repair (risk ratio 4.12, 95% CI 1.56 to 10.88; two trials, 87 women), and awareness of prolapse probably more common. Single trials of site-specific repair against midline fascial plication (74 women) and of levator plication against midline fascial plication (52 women): insufficient evidence for any conclusion. Mesh exposure 7% in the synthetic group of the one trial of a synthetic graft. The authors conclude that the evidence does not support any mesh or graft at posterior vaginal repair.
Open guideline
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:82-86
Abstract read 13 October 2026. Retrospective series from one London unit: 231 women and 244 posterior colporrhaphies, 171 interviewed and 140 examined at a mean of 42.5 months; 209 had prior or concurrent vaginal or bladder neck surgery. Prolapse symptoms fell (64% to 31%); constipation (22% to 33%), incomplete emptying (27% to 38%), faecal incontinence (4% to 11%) and sexual dysfunction (18% to 27%) rose. The vaginal defect was corrected in 76%. The authors conclude that the anatomical defect does not imply dysfunction. The abstract does not describe the technique of repair.
Open guideline
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1762-1771
Abstract read 13 October 2026. 106 women with stage II or greater posterior wall prolapse randomised to posterior colporrhaphy, site-specific repair, or site-specific repair with a porcine graft. Anatomical failure at one year: 4 of 28 (14%), 6 of 27 (22%) and 12 of 26 (46%), P = 0.02. Symptoms, quality of life and sexual function improved in all groups; no significant change in the rate of dyspareunia at one year.
Open guideline