Operative Dictations in Urologic Surgery
Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA, Golan R. Ureteroscopy for tumors. Chapter 80. Wiley, 2019
The indication, the seven essential steps, the template dictation followed step by step, the variations and the complication list (bleeding, infection, failure to access, biopsy or remove the tumour, pain and urinary symptoms, urethral, bladder or renal injury, ureteric perforation, avulsion or intussusception, instrument breakage). The chapter takes cytology through the open-ended catheter before the retrograde study, names forceps, a nitinol extractor or a basket for the biopsy and the holmium laser for ablation and bleeding; its dictation fulgurates with a monopolar electrode. Sizes, pressures and the energy setting are kept off the page. The semirigid look that places the working wire follows the owner’s RIRS decision and the chapter’s variation for the lower ureter. Management lines for the complications and the danger lines are general practice.
Open guideline
EAU Guidelines
Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, 2026: chapters 5 (diagnosis), 6 (risk stratification), 7 (disease management) and 8 (follow-up), read 18 October 2026
Kidney-sparing management as the primary option for low-risk tumours (strong); endoscopy and distal ureterectomy both discussed for a low-risk distal ureteric tumour (strong); second-look ureteroscopy within eight weeks (weak); ablation preferably with lasers, excessive power avoided, complete destruction necessary; recurrence in one in two within two years; barbotage cytology before contrast; grade from biopsy in over 90 per cent, stage unreliable; 2 cm as the size threshold; upper-tract BCG or mitomycin C and their doubtful efficacy; follow-up by cystoscopy and CT urography at three and six months, then yearly. The risk figure is an image and was not read; its footnote that every low-risk factor must be present was. The factors in the first viva answer come from the chapter text on each factor.
Open guideline
European Urology
Masson-Lecomte A, Birtle A, Pradere B, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: summary of the 2025 update. Eur Urol 2025;87:697-716
Abstract read 18 October 2026. A complete revision of risk stratification and ureteroscopy, and two new recommendations on kidney-sparing management of localised low-risk disease.
Open guideline
European Urology
Seisen T, Peyronnet B, Dominguez-Escrig JL, et al. Oncologic outcomes of kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review by the EAU guidelines panel. Eur Urol 2016;70:1052-1068
Abstract read 18 October 2026. Twenty-two retrospective comparative studies; ureteroscopy against nephroureterectomy in five (162 against 367 patients). Similar cancer-specific survival only for low-grade, noninvasive tumours, with more local recurrence after endoscopic treatment; a selection bias favouring kidney-sparing surgery. Used in the fifth viva answer.
Open guideline
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subiela JD, Territo A, Mercadé A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ureteroscopic biopsy in predicting stage and grade at final pathology in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46:1989-1997
Abstract read 18 October 2026. Twenty-three studies, 3,547 patients. Grade matched in 66 per cent of low-grade and 97 per cent of high-grade biopsies; undergrading 32 per cent and understaging 46 per cent. Used in the third viva answer and the under-staged complication.
Open guideline